Chrome CSS Drop Down Menu

 

List of Coordinator by Majoring
Information Systems
Dr. Azah Anir Norman
Software Engineering
Dr. Mohd Hairul Nizam Md Nasir
Artificial Intelligence
Dr. Erma Rahayu Mohd Faizal Abdullah
Computer System and Technology
Dr. Tey Kok Soon
Management
Dr. Azah Anir Norman
Multimedia
Dr. Nurul Fazmidar Mohd Noor
Login as Coordinator
 
Username :
Password :
 
Login as Supervisor/Panel
 
Username :
Password :
 
Login as Student
 
Matric No :
Password : >First Time Login <
 
Best View by Mozilla

Marking Methods: Multimedia

Untitled Document

 

FACULTY OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
UNIVERSITI MALAYA
Unit of Multimedia, Dept. of Computer System & Networking

Evaluation Form (WXES3181/3183) Session: _____________

 

Name                           : ___________________________________________________­
Matric Number                        : WET________________________
Project Title                 : ___________________________________________________

Please evaluate using the below scale for each of the criteria:
0 - None, 1 – Very Poor, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent


A.  REPORT [ 30% marks ]

INTRODUCTION [10% marks]

Number of criteria (c1)

  1. Objectives are relevant and measurable

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Clear description of Problem Statement

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Clear description of project scope

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Clear description of expected outcome

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

Sum 1 =

 

Total 1 = () =

 

LITERATURE REVIEW [10% marks]

Number of criteria (c2)

  1. Adequate background study of related fields for the project.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Consistency in the review (e.g. no conflict in arguments put forth)

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Adequate analysis and exploitation of the review of the articles (e.g. how to leverage)

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

Sum 2  =

 

Total 2 = () =

 

 

 

 

 

PROJECT METHODOLOGY [10% marks]

Number of criteria (c3)

  1. Relevant approach to project realization (i.e. Project/Research Methodology)

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Appropriateness of the data gathering techniques undertaken.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Clear description of functional requirements.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Adequate description and clear representation of the functional requirements analysis.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Clear description of non-functional requirements.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Preliminary design of the system architecture (e.g. conceptual design, DFD, UML diagrams, Entity-Relationship tables).

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Preliminary design of the user interface (e.g. storyboard, sketches, prototype screen shots).

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

Sum 3 =

 

Total 3 = () =

 

Total A = =

 

B. ETIQUET [10% marks]

Number of criteria (c4)

  1. Commitment towards the completion of the project.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Punctuality in submitting tasks given.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Able to work independently

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

Sum 4 =

 

Total B = () =

 

TOTAL = () =

 

GRADE =

 

 
   
   

FACULTY OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
UNIVERSITI MALAYA
Unit of Multimedia, Dept. of Computer System & Networking

Evaluation Form (WRET3180/3182) Session: _____________

 

Name                           : ___________________________________________________­
Matric Number                        : WET________________________
Project Title                 : ___________________________________________________

Please evaluate using the below scale for each of the criteria:
0 - None, 1 – Very Poor, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent


 A.  REPORT [ 30% marks ]

SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN [10% marks]

Number of criteria (c1)

  1. Overview of system architecture

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Behavior Modeling (e.g. for UML, such as sequence diagram, activity diagram, etc., for structured design, such as DFD, PFD, etc.).

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Structure Modeling (e.g. for UML, such as class diagram, etc; for structured design, such as entity relationship diagram, etc.)

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. User Interface Design

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

Sum 1 =

 

Total 1 = () =

 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT [10% marks]

Number of criteria (c2)

  1. Adequate discussion on the development approach(s).

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Adequate discussion on the problems encountered during the development of the system and their solutions.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

Sum 2  =

 

Total 2 = () =

 

 

 

SYSTEM EVALUATION [10% marks]

Number of criteria (c3)

  1. Adequate discussion on system testing techniques and/or user evaluations

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of the developed system.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Discussion on possible future enhancements to the developed system.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

Sum 3 =

 

Total 3 = () =

 

Total A = =

 

B.  ETIQUET [10% marks]

Number of criteria (c4)

  1. Commitment towards the completion of the project.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Punctuality in submitting tasks given.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Able to work independently

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

Sum 4 =

 

Total B = () =

 

TOTAL = () =

 

GRADE =

 

 
   
   

FACULTY OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
UNIVERSITI MALAYA
Unit of Multimedia, Dept. of Computer System & Networking

Evaluation Form (WXES3181/3183) Session: _____________

Name                           :
Matric Number                        : WET
Project Title                 :

Please evaluate using the below scale for each of the criteria:
0 - None, 1 – Very Poor, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent  


VIVA  [ 60 marks ]

   A.

TECHNICAL EVALUATION (45% marks)

Number of criteria (c1)

  1. Relevance and measurable objectives

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Relevant approach to project realization (how to deliver the      project in order to achieve the project’s objectives).

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Expected outcome is described (e.g. conceptual design, sketches of user interface, story board, simple prototype etc).

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Ability to implement basic user interface design.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Ability to implement simple modules / functions (e.g. a module integrated with a database, to update data).

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

Sum I =

 

Total I = () =

 

  B.

PRESENTATION SKILLS EVALUATION (15% marks)

 

Number of criteria (c2)

  1. Effective verbal communication (e.g. clarity of voice, proper grammar, eye contact, expression in voice and talking to the group instead of reading script).

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Ability to answer / handle questions.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Confidence in presenting the project.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

Sum II  =

 

Total II = () =

 

TOTAL () =

 

GRADE =

 

 
   

FACULTY OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
UNIVERSITI MALAYA
Unit of Multimedia, Dept. of Computer System & Networking

Evaluation Form (WRET3180/3182) Session: _____________

 

Name                           : ­
Matric Number                        : WET
Project Title                 :

Please evaluate using the below scale for each of the criteria:
0 - None, 1 – Very Poor, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent  


 VIVA [ 60 marks ]

  A.

TECHNICAL EVALUATION (45% marks)

Number of criteria (c1)

  1. The system has fulfilled the project’s objectives as specified in the proposal

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. The system has fulfilled the specifications as specified in the functional requirement.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Complexity of the system developed.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Ability to explain the implementation of the system (to make sure that the system is not developed by third party).

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Ability to discuss problems encountered during the development of the system and their solutions.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Appropriate testing techniques (unit, integration, user acceptance test, etc.) with proper test case and test data.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. The interfaces of the system are appealing.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. The system flows logically and error-free.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

Sum I =

 

Total I = () =

 

  B.

PRESENTATION SKILLS EVALUATION (15% marks)

 

Number of criteria (c1)

  1. Effective verbal communication (such as clarity of voice, proper grammar, eye contact, expression in voice and talking to the group instead of reading script).

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Ability to answer / handle questions

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

  1. Confidence in presenting the project.

[  0   1    2    3    4    5  ]

Sum II =

 

Total II  = () =

 

TOTAL () =

 

GRADE =